Judge tosses Justin Baldoni’s $400M lawsuit, Blake Lively ‘cried with relief’


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawsuit dismissed

A judge dismissed Justin Baldoni’s $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times, citing a lack of evidence they acted with malice.

Months of back-and-forth

The legal battle began after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the filming of "It Ends With Us," prompting a countersuit and media fallout.

Opportunity to refile

The legal battle began after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the filming of "It Ends With Us," prompting a countersuit and media fallout.


Full story

A judge has dismissed Justin Baldoni’s $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively. The ruling also clears her husband, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times of defamation and extortion claims.

The decision marks a significant legal win for Lively, who has been in a high-profile dispute with her “It Ends With Us” costar since late 2024.

The legal feud began in December 2024 when Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment. She claimed he orchestrated a smear campaign during their work on the film adaptation of “It Ends With Us.”

In response, Baldoni filed a $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times at the end of December. He alleged the outlet’s exclusive article about Lively’s complaint was misleading and accused the paper of “deliberately splicing” communications and texts to sway readers.

Baldoni expanded the lawsuit to include Lively and Reynolds

In January, Baldoni followed up with a countersuit against Lively and Reynolds. He accused the couple of defamation and extortion.

Baldoni’s legal team submitted text messages and previously unreleased behind-the-scenes footage from the movie set in an attempt to support the claims.

Judge rules statements were not malice

On Monday, June 9, court documents revealed that a judge ruled Baldoni’s team failed to show the accused parties acted with defamation-level intent.

As for the Times, Judge Lewis J. Liman’s opinion read, “The alleged facts indicate that the Times reviewed the available evidence and reported, perhaps in a dramatized manner, what it believed to have happened. The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively’s version of events.”

The opinion also read there wasn’t enough evidence to show that Reynolds, Lively and other parties knew their statements were false or seriously doubted their truth.

“The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law,” the ruling stated.

Lively’s team responds to dismissal

Lively’s representatives issued a statement to Deadline calling the ruling a vindication.

“As we have said from day one, this ‘$400 million’ lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it,” the statement read. “We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys’ fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.”

Sources also told People she cried with relief after the dismissal, feeling “vindicated.”

Some claims may be refiled

The judge did allow Baldoni’s production company, Wayfarer Studios, and its parties to refile certain claims related to the case. They have until June 23.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) and Jake Larsen (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

A federal judge's dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times may help to shape the environment for future high-profile harassment and defamation cases in the entertainment industry.

Workplace harassment allegations

The underlying legal battles between Lively and Baldoni center on accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation on a film set, reflecting ongoing concerns about workplace misconduct in the entertainment industry and beyond.

Defamation and public discourse

The dismissal of defamation claims against public figures and a major media outlet demonstrates the challenges of litigating reputation-related disputes in the public sphere, especially when claims arise from protected legal filings or are reported by the press.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 59 media outlets

Context corner

The legal dispute originates from allegations of sexual harassment by Blake Lively against costar and director Justin Baldoni during production of “It Ends With Us.” This reflects broader industry changes following the #MeToo movement, which has increased scrutiny of workplace behavior, encouraged reporting of harassment, and influenced legal protections for those coming forward with allegations.

Quote bank

“Today’s opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively,” stated Lively’s lawyers. Judge Liman wrote, “The Times reviewed the available evidence and reported, perhaps in a dramatized manner, what it believed to have happened. The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively’s version of events.”

The players

Blake Lively is the actress and plaintiff alleging sexual harassment. Justin Baldoni directed and costarred in the film and is the defendant in Lively’s suit, but the plaintiff in the dismissed countersuit. Ryan Reynolds is named as a defendant in Baldoni’s claim. Judge Lewis J. Liman issued the pivotal ruling. Leslie Sloane is Lively’s publicist.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the dismissal of Justin Baldoni’s $400 million lawsuit as a firm and righteous vindication for Blake Lively, portraying Baldoni’s suit as a “sham” and “abusive litigation” with emphatic language signaling moral clarity and justice served.
  • Media outlets in the center adopted a more procedural tone, noting ongoing litigation details and corrections to key claims, thus providing context without the partisan framing seen on either side.
  • Media outlets on the right de-emphasized vindication and instead highlights Baldoni’s failure to prove defamation, casting Lively’s accusations as strategic attempts to “repair her reputation” and control the film, using skeptical and subtly dismissive terms like “baseless” and focusing on the lawsuit’s large dollar figure to suggest excess.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

288 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, ruling that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and immune from suit.
  • Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that Baldoni's claims of extortion and other allegations were also dismissed alongside the defamation suit.
  • Lively has filed a lawsuit against Baldoni for sexual harassment, alleging retaliation related to set conditions for the film "It Ends With Us."
  • Lively's legal team stated that the ruling was a total victory, labeling Baldoni's lawsuit as a sham.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday, June 9, 2025, Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Justin Baldoni’s $400 million defamation case involving Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds.
  • The lawsuit, filed in January 2025, stemmed from Lively’s December 2024 sexual harassment complaint against Baldoni, who denied wrongdoing and countersued for defamation and extortion.
  • The court found Lively’s accusations legally privileged and ruled that the New York Times’ reporting was protected under fair report and litigation privileges.
  • Lively’s legal team described the dismissal as a decisive win and full exoneration, condemning the lawsuit as baseless and announcing their intention to pursue attorneys’ fees and punitive damages.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds on June 9, 2025.
  • Judge Lewis J. Liman stated that Baldoni's claims did not meet the legal requirements for defamation under applicable law.
  • Lively's lawyers called the ruling a "complete vindication" for their client and labeled Baldoni’s lawsuit a "sham."
  • Baldoni has until June 23 to amend claims related to breach of implied covenant and tortious interference.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »