Jury awards $3M to attorney in retaliation case against Orange County DA


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Jury sides with former prosecutor

Tracy Miller, a former Orange County prosecutor, won $3 million in damages after claiming she was forced out for defending colleagues who reported sexual harassment.

County failed to act

The jury found the county failed to act on the harassment reports and also awarded $25,000 in punitive damages against DA Todd Spitzer for his role.

DA denies wrongdoing

Spitzer denied wrongdoing, saying his efforts were aimed at reforming a troubled office.


Full story

On Thursday, June 5, a jury in Orange County, California, awarded $3 million in damages to a former prosecutor who claimed she was forced out of her position for supporting colleagues who reported sexual harassment. The verdict came at the end of a two-week trial held in San Diego, concluding a lawsuit brought by Tracy Miller, a longtime prosecutor and former supervisor in the Orange County District Attorney’s Office.

What was the trial based on? 

Miller sued the county, District Attorney Todd Spitzer, and former Chief Assistant District Attorney Shawn Nelson in February 2022, alleging retaliation and wrongful termination. She retired from the office following 25 years of employment at the DA’s office. According to court documents, she lost her position in 2021 after advocating for female staff members who had come forward with harassment allegations against a senior supervisor.

Miller claimed that DA leadership ousted her because she supported the women and took steps to prevent further harm. Spitzer and Nelson adamantly denied those allegations. 

During the trial, Miller testified that both Spitzer and Nelson repeatedly undermined her authority and publicly humiliated her in the office.

She pointed to the 2020 sexual harassment allegations made against former DA supervisor Gary Logalbo as a turning point. According to Miller, Nelson was dismissive of the women who came forward, making comments that cast doubt on their credibility.

Miller also accused Spitzer of misusing his position in an attempt to discipline one of the accusers by drafting a formal write-up, an act she described as retaliatory and aimed at silencing complaints. Her testimony portrayed a workplace culture that punished those who supported victims rather than addressing the alleged misconduct.

What did the jury decide? 

The jury ultimately sided with Miller and her attorney, concluding that Orange County failed to address the harassment she reported. In addition to the $3 million in damages for future economic loss and emotional distress, the jury awarded Miller $25,000 in punitive damages from Spitzer, citing his direct role in the situation.

The jury awarded Miller $3 million based on two main factors: her projected future economic loss and the emotional distress she suffered due to the retaliation and forced departure from her job.

What does the DA’s office say? 

According to The Associated Press, District Attorney Spitzer said that he inherited an organization facing significant internal challenges when he took over the office in 2019.

In a statement following the verdict, Spitzer said he respects the jury’s decision but feels disappointed that others misunderstood what he described as good intentions.

“I am heartbroken over the fact that any of my actions could have been interpreted as anything other than a good faith effort to clean up the public corruption in the Orange County District Attorney’s Office and to create a work ethic that adheres to what Orange County residents demand of its District Attorney,” he said.

NBC Los Angeles reports, the attorney representing Orange County argued that the $3 million verdict was sufficient to “send a message,” but contended that awarding punitive damages went too far.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor ) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The case raised concerns about workplace retaliation, accountability in public institutions and the treatment of those who support colleagues reporting misconduct in the workplace.

Workplace retaliation

The case brings attention to alleged repercussions faced by employees who support colleagues reporting harassment, underscoring the risks of speaking out against workplace misconduct.

Sexual harassment reporting

The trial centers on how allegations of sexual harassment are addressed within a public office and the consequences for those who report or support such claims.

Public institution accountability

The verdict emphasizes the importance of holding public organizations and officials accountable for addressing internal misconduct and maintaining ethical workplace environments.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 9 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The jury awarded Tracy Miller just over $3 million in damages for economic loss and emotional distress, plus $25,000 in punitive damages. Miller’s attorney had requested more than $300,000 for punitive damages, but the final amount awarded was significantly lower, suggesting the jury recognized harm but was measured in additional penalties from District Attorney Todd Spitzer.

Context corner

The case occurs against broader national discourse about workplace sexual harassment and whistleblower retaliation. Prosecutors, especially women, often face unique institutional pressures when advocating for colleagues. The suit emerged after investigations into a supervisor, Gary Logalbo, found he harassed four female attorneys, reflecting ongoing concerns about workplace culture in public sector legal offices.

History lesson

Workplace retaliation and harassment claims have led to jury awards and policy reforms in the past, particularly since the #MeToo movement. Legal challenges by public prosecutors over retaliation have historically revealed systemic issues and driven changes in workplace policies, particularly in high-profile public offices.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left foreground the narrative of victimization and systemic injustice by emphasizing that the prosecutor was "forced out" due to retaliation linked to protecting women from sexual harassment, using charged terms like "humiliated" and "gender-based slurs" to evoke moral outrage.
  • Media outlets in the center avoid emotionally charged language, instead focusing on broader themes of accountability and systemic challenges facing female prosecutors, de-emphasizing specific personal abuses or punitive damages.
  • Media outlets on the right while not heavily explored here, tend to frame the award as a validation of law enforcement integrity and highlights the jury’s decision more neutrally, aligning with support for institutional authority rather than the victim’s emotional trauma.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

9 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A jury in California awarded over $3 million to a former Orange County prosecutor after she alleged she was forced out for protecting women from retaliation related to sexual harassment claims.
  • The jury awarded damages for future economic loss and emotional distress, with Miller also receiving $25,000 in punitive damages.
  • Miller accused District Attorney Todd Spitzer and Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Nelson of humiliating her and using "gender-based slurs."
  • Spitzer and Nelson denied the claims, asserting that Miller did not face demotion or loss of pay or job duties.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A California jury awarded former Orange County prosecutor Tracy Miller over $3 million after deciding she was forced out of her job.
  • Miller claimed she lost her position because she protected women who accused supervisors of sexual harassment, prompting the lawsuit.
  • The two-week trial in San Diego included Miller's allegations of misconduct against Todd Spitzer, the Orange County district attorney, and Shawn Nelson, former chief assistant DA.
  • The jury ruled in favor of Miller, acknowledging her emotional distress and anticipated financial damages, while Spitzer and Nelson refuted the allegations.
  • The verdict underscores the obstacles that women prosecutors encounter when trying to tackle workplace harassment and ensure leadership is responsible for misconduct.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »