NYC continues congestion pricing toll despite federal deadline to suspend it


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Officials defy White House

New York City has kept its congestion pricing program active despite a missed federal deadline to suspend it. This marks the second time Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority have defied a White House directive to end the toll.

State defends tolls

State officials defend the tolls — $9 for most vehicles entering Manhattan below 60th Street during peak hours — noting the program reduced traffic, boosted business, raised $48.6 million in January alone and helps fund transit improvements.

White House claims

The federal government, which reversed its earlier approval in February, argues the tolls are illegal and harmful to working-class drivers, warning that failure to suspend the program by May 21 could lead to loss of federal funding and halted project approvals.


Full story

  • New York City has kept its congestion pricing program active despite a missed federal deadline to suspend it. This marks the second time Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority have defied a White House directive to end the toll.
  • State officials defend the tolls — $9 for most vehicles entering Manhattan below 60th Street during peak hours — noting that the program reduced traffic, boosted business, raised $48.6 million in January alone and helped fund transit improvements.
  • The federal government, which reversed its earlier approval in February, argues the tolls are illegal and harmful to working-class drivers. It warns that failure to suspend the program by May 21 could result in loss of federal funding and halted project approvals.

Full Story

The federal deadline for New York City to halt its congestion pricing program passed on April 20, but the tolling system remains in place. This marks the second instance in which New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) have not complied with a White House directive to suspend the initiative.

Why does New York support congestion pricing?

In a statement, a spokesperson for Hochul defended the tolls, saying, “The program is working. Traffic is down, business is up and the cameras are staying on.”

The plan charges most cars entering Manhattan below 60th Street a peak fee of $9 from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekends, generating $48.6 million in January alone. State law mandates spending 80% of those funds on improvements to the city’s bus and subway systems.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Why does the federal government oppose congestion pricing?

The U.S. Department of Transportation has expressed opposition to the state’s decision. On Monday, April 21, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy issued a letter to Hochul warning of “serious consequences” if the program is not suspended or if legal justification for its continuation is not provided by May 21.

The letter indicated that failure to comply could result in the loss of federal funding and the withholding of approvals for state transportation projects.

“New York’s elitist cordon pricing scheme is illegal, a form of class warfare that targets working Americans, and unfair to the driving public whose tax dollars have already paid for these roads,” the Transportation Department said in a social media post.

How did this dispute over the toll begin?

The argument over the tolling system began in February when federal officials rescinded their prior approval of the congestion pricing plan, citing concerns that it places an undue burden on working-class Americans.

In response to the federal action, the MTA filed a lawsuit challenging the reversal in federal court. The agency has stated that the tolls will remain in place while the case is pending, with a court decision potentially coming in late October 2024.

What happens next?

Separately, a series of legal challenges brought by consumer advocacy groups against the tolling system were dismissed in federal court last week. However, these organizations have vowed to refile their lawsuits.

Meanwhile, the Department of Transportation has stated it will continue to oppose what it describes as an “unlawful tax on hardworking Americans.”

Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The ongoing conflict over New York City's congestion pricing program signifies broader concerns regarding federal-state relations and transportation funding critical for urban planning.

Federal-State Tension

The tension between New York state and the federal government illustrates the complexities and challenges of state autonomy in implementing local policies.

Economic Impact

Congestion pricing aims to improve traffic and raise funds for essential public transportation projects, highlighting the economic stakes involved for both the state and federal government.

Transportation Policy

This situation underscores the significance of transportation policy as a crucial aspect of urban infrastructure planning and its implications for public accessibility and environmental sustainability.

Get the big picture

Common ground

Both articles highlight the Trump administration's assertions regarding New York's congestion pricing toll, emphasizing the potential withholding of federal funding if the state continues the program. They agree on the toll's intent to fund public transport initiatives and reduce traffic congestion, while outlining the controversy surrounding its legality and necessity for compliance with federal regulations.

Context corner

Historically, congestion pricing has been successful in major urban areas like London and Stockholm, where similar initiatives significantly reduced traffic congestion and provided funding for public transport. The push for such measures in New York reflects a growing awareness of urban transport challenges, despite the unique political and socioeconomic landscape.

Diverging views

The articles exhibit a divergence in perspective with the left leaning article focusing on claims of class warfare against working-class Americans, criticizing the congestion toll as burdensome. In contrast, right leaning narratives emphasize the potential failure of New York's transit system without federal compliance, framing the toll regulations as necessary for proper governance.

Underreported

An underreported aspect across the articles is the specific impact of congestion pricing on local businesses and community sentiment. While the articles mention the toll's aim is to reduce traffic and improve public transport funding, details on how local businesses react to the toll—positive or negative—are not significantly highlighted.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

69 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »