Supreme Court unanimously rules Mexico can’t sue American gun makers


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

A unanimous court

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Mexico cannot sue U.S. gun manufacturers for violence committed in Mexico with American-made weapons.

No aiding and abetting

Mexico alleged gun manufacturers aided and abetted traffickers by knowing some retailers sell weapons illegally. The justices said that's insufficient.

A severe gun violence problem

According to data from Mexico, more than 200,000 guns, worth $250 million are smuggled into the country ever year.


Full story

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Mexican government cannot sue Smith & Wesson and other gun manufacturers for violence committed in Mexico with American-made weapons. Mexico wanted to sue for $10 billion in damages, but the justices said it is not plausible that gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun traffickers, and therefore, they are not liable.

Mexico made what the justices described as a general accusation: gun manufacturers knowingly provide their weapons to retailers who illegally sell them to criminals who then smuggle them to Mexico. The complaint claimed the manufacturers are responsible because they failed to implement controls on their distribution networks to prevent illegal sales. 

The problem is that Mexico did not name a single retailer accused of illegal sales and did not prove that manufacturers know of a single, specific retailer who is breaking the law. Lawyers for Mexico also couldn’t overcome the fact that gun manufacturers don’t provide their weapons directly to retailers; they give them to distributors who sell them to retailers. So there’s another party between the distributors and the smugglers. 

“Mexico does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the unanimous opinion. “To aid and abet a crime, a person must take an affirmative act in furtherance of the offense and intend to facilitate its commission.” 

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act prohibits lawsuits against gun manufacturers and retailers for crimes committed by a third party. There is an exception for manufacturers or retailers who “knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing” of the gun, and the “violation was a proximate cause of the harm.” 

During oral arguments, attorneys for the gun manufacturers argued they aren’t even partly responsible because there are a number of intervening, independent crimes that take place before the gun is used to commit acts of violence in Mexico. Those crimes include a fake purchase and cross-border trafficking. 

Attorneys for Mexico argued the gun manufacturers are responsible because the unlawful use of their product was foreseeable, and manufacturers are aware that it happens. 

According to data from the Mexican government, approximately 200,000 guns are smuggled into the country every year from the United States, and up to 90% of the guns recovered at crime scenes in Mexico originated in the United States. The lawsuit states that over $250 million worth of firearms are trafficked into Mexico each year.

The Supreme Court admitted that Mexico has a “severe gun violence problem.” However, it determined that illegal acts are too far removed from the manufacturer to hold them accountable. 

Lea Mercado (Digital Production Manager) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 85 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Several sources cite that between 200,000 to 500,000 American-made firearms are trafficked into Mexico each year, with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives reporting nearly half of all guns recovered at Mexican crime scenes are manufactured in the U.S.

Community reaction

Gun violence prevention groups, such as GIFFORDS Law Center, express disappointment but note their resolve to hold lawbreakers accountable in court. Meanwhile, representatives from the firearms industry, like the National Shooting Sports Foundation, view the Court’s decision as a crucial protection for lawful manufacturers and the "rule of law," according to their public statements.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the Supreme Court ruling as a setback for Mexico’s right to seek redress, highlighting the $10 billion lawsuit’s serious allegations that U.S. gunmakers “fueled cartel violence” and stressing strained U.S.-Mexico relations, using terms like “against” and “rejects” to convey disapproval.
  • Media outlets in the center adopted a neutral, procedural tone, de-emphasizing these emotional and ideological inflections.
  • Media outlets on the right portrayed the decision as a “major victory” for the Second Amendment, emphasizing industry responsibility and accusing Mexico of bad faith efforts to “bankrupt” gun manufacturers, employing assertive phrases like “strikes down” and “throws out” to celebrate the outcome.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

136 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Supreme Court ruled on June 5 that Mexico cannot hold U.S. gunmakers liable for violence from drug cartels using their weapons, citing protections under federal law.
  • The case involves a claim that gunmakers knowingly aided illegal gun trafficking, but the court emphasized the separation between manufacturing and criminal use.
  • Mexico, seeking about $10 billion in damages, argued that firearm companies' practices contribute to trafficking guns into Mexico to cartels.
  • Justice Elena Kagan stated, "An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product."

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Supreme Court ruled that Mexico cannot sue U.S. gun manufacturers over cartel violence, blocking a $10 billion lawsuit.
  • This unanimous decision was based on U.S. laws that protect firearm manufacturers from liability.
  • Mexico argued that U.S. gunmakers knowingly sell products to drug cartels, but the court dismissed the case.
  • The ruling ended Mexico's lawsuit, agreeing with gun manufacturers that the case should not proceed.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Supreme Court ruled that Mexico cannot sue U.S. gun manufacturers over allegations of aiding illegal sales to cartels, finding no exceptions under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act .
  • Justice Elena Kagan noted that Mexico's lawsuit failed to show that the gun manufacturers aided and abetted illegal sales to traffickers.
  • The Mexican government sought $10 billion in damages, claiming U.S. manufacturers contributed to cartel violence by facilitating unlawful gun sales.
  • The ruling reversed the 1st Court of Appeals decision in favor of Mexico and confirmed protections for gun manufacturers under PLCAA.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • Mexico is accusing US firearms manufacturers of aiding and abetting drug cartels and wants $10 billion in damages.
    Getty Images
    International
    Mar 3

    Mexico’s lawsuit against American gun makers heads to Supreme Court 

    Mexico’s lawsuit alleging American gun manufacturers are culpable for cartel violence is headed to the Supreme Court Tuesday, March 4. Mexico is accusing U.S.-based firearms manufacturers of aiding and abetting drug cartels and is suing for $10 billion in damages.   Mexico filed suit against the largest gun manufacturers in America, including Smith and Wesson, Glock,…

  • The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case brought by Mexico against American gun manufacturers, claiming they contribute to cartel violence.
    AP Images
    International
    Oct 4

    US Supreme Court to decide if Mexico can sue gun manufacturers

    The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case brought by Mexico against major American gun manufacturers amid claims that these companies are indirectly responsible for escalating violence fueled by drug cartels. The lawsuit alleged that the manufacturers failed to enforce proper safeguards, allowing firearms to be trafficked into Mexico, where they contribute to…

Timeline

  • Mexico is accusing US firearms manufacturers of aiding and abetting drug cartels and wants $10 billion in damages.
    Getty Images
    International
    Mar 3

    Mexico’s lawsuit against American gun makers heads to Supreme Court 

    Mexico’s lawsuit alleging American gun manufacturers are culpable for cartel violence is headed to the Supreme Court Tuesday, March 4. Mexico is accusing U.S.-based firearms manufacturers of aiding and abetting drug cartels and is suing for $10 billion in damages.   Mexico filed suit against the largest gun manufacturers in America, including Smith and Wesson, Glock,…

  • The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case brought by Mexico against American gun manufacturers, claiming they contribute to cartel violence.
    AP Images
    International
    Oct 4

    US Supreme Court to decide if Mexico can sue gun manufacturers

    The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case brought by Mexico against major American gun manufacturers amid claims that these companies are indirectly responsible for escalating violence fueled by drug cartels. The lawsuit alleged that the manufacturers failed to enforce proper safeguards, allowing firearms to be trafficked into Mexico, where they contribute to…

OSZAR »