Trump admin cancels $766 million in funding for Moderna


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Canceled vaccine contract

The Trump administration canceled $766 million in funding for Moderna’s bird flu vaccine, citing safety and scientific concerns.

Preliminary results

Moderna reported promising early trial results but now faces uncertainty without government backing.

mRNA concerns

HHS stated mRNA technology remains under-tested and not worth further investment for H5N1 at this time.


Full story

Moderna announced Wednesday, May 28, that the Trump administration canceled  $766 million in funding for the pharmaceutical manufacturer’s late-stage development and right to purchase bird flu vaccines. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services cited safety and scientific concerns in its decision to cancel the contract, while Moderna shared early clinical results from its experimental bird flu vaccine.

The drugmaker shared promising early results from a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of its experimental bird flu vaccine, mRNA-1018, which includes about 300 adult volunteers.

“mRNA-1018 demonstrated a rapid, potent and durable immune response,” the company said in a release.

Stéphane Bancel, chief executive officer of Moderna, added that even though the canceled contract creates uncertainty, the drugmaker “will explore alternative paths forward for the program.”

Background on the contract

The Biden administration awarded Moderna a $590 million contract in mid-January to continue developing its bird flu vaccine using mRNA technology and to expand clinical trials for possible future pandemics. The funding would have helped Moderna quickly develop a bird flu vaccine that targets the current strains of H5N1 that are now spreading in animals.

The Trump administration also canceled a $176 million grant to fund late-stage development and testing of a pre-pandemic mRNA-based vaccine against the H5N1 avian influenza, according to Reuters.

HHS explains cancellation

A spokesperson for HHS said the administration concluded Moderna’s bird flu vaccine is not scientifically sound or safe enough.

“After a rigorous review, we concluded that continued investment in Moderna’s H5N1 mRNA vaccine was not scientifically or ethically justifiable,” HHS Communications Director Andrew Nixon said in a statement. “This is not simply about efficacy — it’s about safety, integrity, and trust. The reality is that mRNA technology remains under-tested, and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration, which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public.”

mRNA and government vaccine contracts

Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna used mRNA technology in the COVID-19 vaccines, which later came under scrutiny despite being effective and widely used.

Currently, the U.S. government has active contracts with Johnson & Johnson, a pharmaceutical company that also developed a COVID-19 vaccine without using mRNA technology. Those contracts include an $86 million agreement with the U.S. Department of Defense and a 10-year, $75 billion contract with HHS awarded in 2023.

COVID-19 vaccine maker Pfizer Inc. received a contract modification worth nearly $1.96 billion to supply Paxlovid, an oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19, which ends in 2028.

Since 2020, the U.S. government has awarded Moderna more than $10 billion in contracts to develop vaccines and treatments for the COVID-19 virus.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Lea Mercado (Digital Production Manager) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' cancellation of a major bird flu vaccine contract with Moderna highlights government concerns over the safety and scientific justification of mRNA vaccine development for future pandemics.

Government funding

Decisions about funding vaccine development directly influence the speed and direction of research and preparedness for potential pandemics.

mRNA vaccine safety

Debate over the safety and scientific rigor of mRNA vaccine technology shapes public trust and policy decisions regarding new vaccine approvals.

Pandemic preparedness

Actions taken by government agencies to approve or halt vaccine initiatives impact the nation's readiness to respond to emerging infectious diseases such as bird flu.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 216 media outlets

Context corner

Historically, new vaccine technologies have faced skepticism and policy reversals, often tied to shifts in political leadership. The mRNA platform demonstrated rapid vaccine deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic, which influenced investment in similar pandemic-preparedness projects. However, the political climate, shifts in vaccine recommendations, and ongoing debate about mRNA safety contribute to the current context behind this contract's termination.

Debunking

Multiple scientific studies and regulatory assessments support the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines, with more than a billion doses safely administered worldwide for COVID-19. Claims that mRNA vaccines are uniquely dangerous are not supported by real-world evidence or the major medical consensus, despite lingering skepticism voiced by some current officials and referenced in policy decisions.

Solution spotlight

Despite the funding cut, Moderna announced plans to seek alternative routes for late-stage development and manufacturing of the bird flu vaccine. Public health experts continue to recommend investment in diverse vaccine platforms and stress the importance of maintaining robust pandemic preparedness, even as specific technologies face regulatory or political setbacks.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the cancellation as a politically motivated setback endangering public health and pandemic preparedness, emphasizing the crucial role of mRNA technology and condemning the administration’s “attack on mRNA vaccines” using emotionally charged language like “disappointing” and “short-sighted.”
  • Media outlets in the center offer a more balanced, neutral tone, recognizing both the safety concerns and innovation risks.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight “legitimate safety concerns” and portray the decision as an ethically justified, fiscally responsible move that protects taxpayers from “under-tested” technologies, often invoking skepticism through words like “slams” and stressing vaccine hesitancy influences such as Robert F. Kennedy

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

216 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Health and Human Services Department canceled $766 million in funding with Moderna to develop a vaccine for potential influenza pandemics, including H5N1 bird flu viruses.
  • Moderna was informed that funding for its investigational mRNA-1018 vaccine would be withdrawn, despite reported positive interim results in early-stage trials.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services canceled $766 million in funding with Moderna in July 2024 to develop an mRNA vaccine targeting pandemic influenza, including H5N1 bird flu.
  • This funding was initially awarded through BARDA to support development of Moderna's mRNA-1018 vaccine using COVID-19 technology, after a $590 million contract announcement in January 2021.
  • Moderna revealed encouraging interim findings from a Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and immune response of its H5N1 vaccine in 300 healthy adults, amid ongoing bird flu outbreaks affecting U.S. Wildlife and livestock.
  • The cancellation raises uncertainty for pandemic flu preparedness despite warnings that continued H5N1 mutation could trigger a pandemic and criticism of mRNA vaccines by some officials.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Health and Human Services determined the vaccine project did not meet scientific or safety standards for continued investment, stated Andrew Nixon.
  • Moderna announced positive interim results from trials for the H5 avian flu vaccine, noting the robust immune response observed.
  • Dr. Ashish Jha criticized the decision, saying the attack on mRNA vaccines is 'beyond absurd,' as Operation Warp Speed led to mRNA vaccine development.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »