Trump administration urges half a million immigrants to self-deport


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

CHNV program termination

The Trump administration has begun issuing notices to 500,000 foreign nationals, primarily from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, directing them to leave the United States immediately.

Government justification

Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized the CHNV program, alleging that the Biden administration “allowed more than half a million poorly vetted aliens” into the United States through what she called “disastrous parole programs.”

Legal developments

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's authority to terminate the CHNV program in late May, ruling that humanitarian parole for the recipients may be revoked.


Full story

The Trump administration has begun issuing notices to 500,000 foreign nationals — primarily from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela — instructing them to leave the United States immediately. The Biden administration admitted these individuals under a humanitarian parole program known as CHNV, which allowed them to live and work temporarily in the U.S.

What is the CHNV program?

The CHNV program, established in 2023, granted eligible individuals two-year humanitarian parole to enter and remain in the U.S., along with work authorization. Officials did not consider the program as a formal immigration status, but it provided short-term refuge to citizens fleeing political turmoil and humanitarian crises in their home countries.

President Donald Trump formally terminated the program in May. On Thursday, June 12, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began notifying recipients that it had terminated their parole and revoked their employment authorization, effective immediately.

What did the administration say?

In a strongly worded statement, Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized the program

“The Biden Administration lied to America. They allowed more than half a million poorly vetted aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela and their immediate family members to enter the United States through these disastrous parole programs; granted them opportunities to compete for American jobs and undercut American workers; forced career civil servants to promote the programs even when fraud was identified; and then blamed Republicans in Congress for the chaos that ensued and the crime that followed,” McLaughlin wrote in the statement.

In late May, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld President Trump’s authority to terminate the CHNV program, ruling that the administration may revoke humanitarian parole for the more than 500,000 recipients. That decision followed a separate ruling allowing the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for about 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants, a program that had offered relief since 2021 amid Venezuela’s collapse.

What’s next for CHNV recipients?

According to CNN, the notices direct recipients to self-deport: “If you do not leave, you may be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to detention and removal, without an opportunity to make personal arrangements and return to your country in an orderly manner.” 

Officials also instructed recipients to return their work permits to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Those who comply voluntarily will be eligible for travel assistance and a $1,000 exit bonus.

Jason Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor), and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The termination of the CHNV humanitarian parole program and ensuing mass removal orders for 500,000 foreign nationals highlight significant changes in U.S. immigration policy with immediate impacts on affected individuals, workforce dynamics, and humanitarian considerations.

Immigration policy changes

The decision to end the CHNV parole program and revoke protections for recipients marks a major shift in U.S. immigration policy direction and priorities.

Humanitarian impact

Ending the program removes temporary refuge and work authorization for individuals fleeing crises, affecting their safety and well-being.

Legal and political debate

Court rulings and statements from officials reflect ongoing legal and political disagreements over how to address migration and humanitarian programs.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 101 media outlets

Context corner

The humanitarian parole program was established to offer legal entry and temporary residence for migrants from countries facing political or humanitarian crises. Such parole programs have been used in the past for various nationalities but are typically discretionary and tied to U.S. foreign policy, border management concerns, and domestic economic or security considerations.

Debunking

While some officials claim that the parole program allowed poorly vetted migrants and contributed to crime or labor market disruption, supporters counter that entrants were required to pass background checks and have financial sponsors. Independent reports and court records have not established widespread fraud or criminality specifically linked to this program.

Policy impact

The order immediately affects migrants’ legal status, employment, and eligibility for public services, increasing vulnerability to detention or deportation. Healthcare and service sectors that rely on these workers may experience staffing shortages. The new policy also signals a broader shift in the U.S. approach to humanitarian migration.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the termination of the Biden-era parole program as a destabilizing, punitive blow to legally vetted migrants, emphasizing humanitarian concerns and migrant fears of deportation, illustrated by emotionally charged terms like “terminated” and “have to leave.”
  • Media outlets in the center offer a more measured tone, acknowledging both legal legitimacy and security concerns without overt partisanship.
  • Media outlets on the right portray the program as a “fraudulent,” “poorly vetted” “scheme” that endangered American jobs and safety, using hard-edged language such as “illegals” and “self-deport” to underscore enforcement and national security priorities.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

113 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »