Why the UN opposes a US-backed group taking over aid operations in Gaza


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Opposition

A U.S.-backed aid group known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is facing opposition from the U.N. over concerns its practices may violate international law and it lacks the ability to adequately deliver humanitarian aid to Gazans.

Leader's resignation

The shift toward GHF for food distribution in Gaza follows the resignation of its executive director on Sunday. He raised concerns with the group’s ability to operate independently of Israel and without the help of the U.N.

Warning

Hamas has warned Palestinians not to accept aid from the GHF, creating fear on the ground. The U.N. has also raised alarms that the GHF’s model may involve vetting who receives food — a practice considered discriminatory under humanitarian law.


Full story

A humanitarian group backed by the U.S. and Israel has started to take over aid operations in Gaza, despite opposition from the United Nations and other aid organizations. The move coincides with Israel reaching 600 days since the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas — the inciting event for the war in Gaza. 

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the new lead aid group, began operations this week, just as its executive director resigned on Sunday, May 25.

What happens now?

GHF is now handling tasks previously led by the U.N., which, until recently, provided most of Gaza’s food, medical supplies, fuel, tents and other essentials. This shift comes as Israel renewed military operations aimed at pressuring Hamas to release the remaining 58 Israeli hostages — 23 of whom are believed to still be alive.

Authorities now limit aid distribution to just a few centers guarded by armed security contractors and located near Israeli military hubs. Israel pushed for the change, accusing Hamas of stealing aid and blocking food deliveries. 

For months, Israel has blocked medical supplies, food, fuel and other aid from entering Gaza, only recently allowing for the flow of aid to resume, under the condition that GHF heads operations. Under the new arrangement, the U.N. must now coordinate through GHF to continue distributing supplies.

Why do the UN and others oppose the move?

The U.N. argues that GHF lacks the capacity, independence and logistical reach needed and warns that the setup may violate international law by “weaponizing” food. Critics point to an incident on Tuesday, May 27, when thousands of Palestinians flooded a new GHF distribution site and Israeli troops opened fire. The incident injured three people, and some Palestinians left with little or no food.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu acknowledged the situation but stated that it had since been brought under control, and aid operations will continue. World Central Kitchen founder Jose Andres condemned the incident and GHF’s operations on X. 

“The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has left Palestinians without food. The people that created it are selfish,” Andres wrote on the social media platform, and argued the change in operations has left Gazans “really hungry.”

But just a day later, on Wednesday, May 28, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry said multiple people were killed and dozens of others were injured when Israeli troops shot at a crowd rushing a food distribution hub run by the GHF. Israeli officials deny that troops fired upon those seeking aid. 

Ongoing challenges

Adding to the GHF’s challenges, the Hamas-run Interior Ministry has advised Palestinians against accepting help from the organization. Some residents told The Associated Press they fear approaching Israeli-controlled aid hubs. Others noted that, unlike before, they now encounter American or Israeli security forces when seeking food.

Trucks delivering food are heavily guarded, and Israeli officials have admitted the current system excludes portions of the population. The U.N.-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warns that 500,000 Palestinians face starvation if food deliveries don’t ramp up.

How many distribution hubs are running?

The Israeli military reports that two of the four planned hubs are now operational. GHF stated that it will be able to feed nearly half of Gaza’s population by the end of the week and ultimately aims to serve all 2.3 million residents. It expects the remaining hubs to be ready within a month.

The group said the goal is to prevent aid theft by Hamas or criminal groups, but it has not specified how or when aid will reach areas currently excluded.

Critics argue the hubs are difficult to access, especially for residents in northern Gaza, where no distribution sites currently exist. Most Palestinians now live in the north, while all existing aid hubs are located in the central and southern regions.

The U.N. contends this amounts to forced displacement, as Gazans must walk across Israeli military lines, often undergoing vetting processes, to receive food. Human rights groups warn this system could discriminate against those suspected of Hamas ties, determining who eats and who doesn’t.

Why did GHF’s head resign?

It’s also unclear who will run GHF following the resignation of its former leader, Jake Wood. Wood co-founded a disaster aid group dubbed Team Rubicon and is a U.S. military veteran. Wood said on Sunday that he was stepping down because it was evident GHF would not be able to operate independently without interference from Israel. He also questioned his organization’s ability to adequately distribute all the necessary aid to Gazans. 

In a letter to Israeli officials before his resignation, Wood stated that the U.N. should continue its operations until GHF could establish at least eight distribution hubs. He acknowledged that the U.N. would continue to supply medicine, hygiene items and tents, as his organization was unable to handle the distribution of such materials.

Israel’s aid coordination agency, COGAT, has not confirmed whether it agreed to those conditions.

UN warns GHF can’t meet Gaza’s needs

The U.N. and other humanitarian agencies argue the GHF is incapable of meeting the needs of Gazans, as its plans for distribution remain in flux. Each GHF meal contains 1,750 calories, short of the 2,100-calorie daily emergency minimum set by the World Health Organization and UNICEF.

These groups say the most difficult obstacle to food aid isn’t who runs it, it’s Israel’s restrictions. The country wants full access across Gaza for established aid groups.

UNICEF spokesperson James Elder said that the U.N. and other aid organizations “have shown that they can meet the needs of that population, when allowed to.” Elder added, “We need to just keep reverting back to what works.”

Vetting concerns

Israel has previously told aid organizations that it plans to vet aid recipients by employing facial recognition technology. GHF, however, maintains food will be distributed based on need, not on eligibility. But critics argue crossing through Israeli military checkpoints will open up Palestinians to a vetting process. 

GHF, founded earlier this year, is staffed by U.S. security contractors, ex-military personnel, and aid workers. It has full support from the U.S. and Israeli governments.

The GHF has refuted allegations of “weaponizing” aid distribution or instigating mass displacement. It describes itself as a non-political organization committed to maintaining “impartiality and independence.”

U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce dismissed concerns about the GHF and said the No. 1 priority is getting aid to Gazans, regardless of who’s delivering it. She accused Hamas of stopping aid convoys operated by the GHF due to the lack of food getting to distribution hubs, but said Hamas failed, and convoy operations have since resumed. 

Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Efforts to change the system of humanitarian aid delivery in Gaza by establishing a new U.S.- and Israeli-backed foundation have raised significant humanitarian, legal, and operational concerns as millions face critical food insecurity and longstanding aid organizations express strong opposition.

Aid distribution control

Who controls the distribution of humanitarian aid in Gaza is crucial because, according to the United Nations and aid groups, the new model may limit access, decrease transparency, and potentially violate humanitarian principles.

Principles and legality

Debate over whether the new structure upholds or violates international law and humanitarian norms is central, as many organizations—including the UN—argue that the plan risks weaponizing assistance and could facilitate forced displacement, as stated by multiple aid sources.

Food security and impact

The ability of the new aid mechanism to effectively reach and support Gaza’s vulnerable population is under question, with UNICEF, U.N. officials, and aid workers warning that any shortfall in delivery standards or caloric content could have life-threatening consequences for civilians facing hunger.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 45 media outlets

Context corner

Historically, the U.N. and humanitarian agencies have overseen aid distribution in Gaza, prioritizing neutrality and adherence to humanitarian law. Israel’s new mechanism, developed amid accusations that Hamas diverts aid, seeks greater oversight. These shifts occur in a larger context of ongoing conflict, prior blockades, and high rates of civilian displacement within the Strip.

Debunking

Claims by Israel that Hamas systematically diverts large quantities of aid remain disputed. U.N. agencies have consistently denied significant diversion and point to transparent monitoring processes. Humanitarian organizations argue no substantial evidence has been provided for consistent diversion, while Israel maintains its position as justification for the new distribution strategy.

Global impact

The controversy has reached the international stage, with a joint statement from two dozen countries — including the U.K., EU nations, Canada, and Australia — opposing the new system, citing breaches of international law. International humanitarian principles and norms are under scrutiny, and the efficacy of global aid intervention in conflict settings is being tested.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left foreground skepticism toward the Gaza aid plan, emphasizing its humanitarian insufficiency, potential violations of international law, and framing the initiative as an extension of Israeli control — with emotionally charged terms like “rejecting” and highlighting resignations over lack of independence to underscore distrust.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right adopt a defensive tone stressing national security concerns, casting doubt on aid organizations’ credibility by questioning their motives and “trust” in a manner revealing a partisan focus on sovereignty and skepticism toward international actors.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

45 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A U.S.-backed group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, intends to start aid distribution in Gaza despite opposition from several humanitarian organizations and the U.N. over its methods and leadership changes.
  • The GHF plans to limit food distribution to four guarded hubs, primarily located near military positions, which may cause access issues for many of Gaza's 2.3 million residents.
  • Aid groups warn that the new aid distribution plan may violate humanitarian principles and risks using food as a weapon for political purposes.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation , backed by Israel and the United States, plans to take over food aid distribution in Gaza through a new hub-based system as conflict continues in 2025.
  • Israel demands this alternative plan citing concerns over Hamas siphoning aid, while the United Nations and many aid groups reject it for breaching humanitarian principles and inefficiency.
  • The GHF model limits food distribution to a few hubs guarded by armed contractors near Israeli military positions, requiring recipients to pass through Israeli-controlled areas for aid access.
  • Jake Wood, former GHF executive director, resigned because the group could not operate independently, and aid groups warn the plan risks violating international law and weaponizing aid.
  • The ongoing blockade and restricted aid increase famine risk for 2.1 million Gazans, and the UN stresses that humanitarian organizations can meet needs if allowed to continue their operations.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

OSZAR »